writers.com feature:
Banned Books Week
By Paula Guran
"Banned Books Week: Celebrating the Freedom to Read" is celebrated the
last week of September. The event is sponsored by the American Booksellers Association, the
American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, the American
Library Association, the American Society of Journalists and Authors,
the Association of American Publishers, and the National Association of
College Stores. It is endorsed by the Center for the Book of the Library
of Congress.
Banned Books Week (BBW) serves as a reminder to Americans not to take
their freedom to read for granted. The week reminds us that not only do
we have the freedom to choose what we read, but the freedom to express
opinion even if that opinion is unorthodox or unpopular. BBW also
emphasizes that we must ensure the availability of those unorthodox or
unpopular viewpoints to all who wish to read them. As the American
Library Association states in their the Intellectual Freedom Manual:
"Intellectual freedom can exist only where two essential conditions are
met: first, that all individuals have the right to hold any belief on
any subject and to convey their ideas in any form they deem appropriate;
and second, that society makes an equal commitment to the right of
unrestricted access to information and ideas regardless of the
communication medium used, the content of the work, and the viewpoints
of both the author and receiver of information. Freedom to express
oneself through a chosen mode of communication, including the Internet,
becomes virtually meaningless if access to that information is not
protected. Intellectual freedom implies a circle, and that circle is
broken if either freedom of expression or access to ideas is stifled."
In 2003, as BBW was observed, booksellers and librarians were fighting
to amend the USA Patriot Act, which they believe impinges on Americans'
right to keep private the records of their book purchases and library
withdrawals. Judith Krug, director of ALA's Office for Intellectual
Freedom, said in a press release, "The ability to read, speak, think,
and express ourselves freely are core American values. We hope Banned
Books Week helps to remind Americans of the importance of our freedom at
a time when freedoms are being eroded in the United States. Now -- more
than ever -- we must let freedom read."
Most of the books featured during BBW are not banned, but "challenged"
by individuals or groups. A successful challenge, however, would result
in materials being banned or restricted. Librarians have met these
challenges and retained the books in their collections.
Nowadays most of the opposition to books is the result of a sincere
desire to protect children. Some of the most often-challenged titles are
challenged by those who see any reference to magic, witchcraft, or
wizardry as morally reprehensible. The "Goosebumps" and "Fear Street"
series by R.L. Stine (once highly challenged, but now relatively
ignored) were protested by some as "too frightening" for young folks and
as depicting "occult" or "Satanic" themes. The "Captain Underpants"
series by Dav Pilkey has been opposed for "insensitivity and being
unsuited to age group, as well as encouraging children to disobey
authority."
The most frequent challenges, however, involve "inappropriate" sexual
content and "offensive" language. As a parent myself, I am quite aware
that the world in which we live is full of peril. Like most parents, I
often feel as if I have little or no power when it comes to protecting
my children from these many dangers. The availability of reading
material is, some parents feel, one area where parents can retain
"control."
The point Banned Books Weeks seeks to make is (as the ALA's basic policy
states) that librarians "and governing bodies should maintain that
parents-and only parents-have the right and the responsibility to
restrict the access of their children-and only their children-to library
resources." Protection is not excuse to violate First Amendment rights.
Parents insisting on their values and standards to be upheld in their
children's reading is commendable, but once you try to extend your
governance over other people's children -- you have become a censor.
Those who seek to censor books recognize and fear the power of words.
BBW serves to remind the rest of us of that power.
* * *
In researching this, I came across a few books that I was surprised had
been challenged or banned.
(THE) KING MUST DIE by Mary Renault
Has too much "sex and violence" for middle school libraries. Along with
sister-book THE BULL FROM THE SEA, Renault's exciting novel is based on
Greek myths of the hero Theseus, it brings plausible possible history
and myth together in. I first read this at age 12 - middle school age --
and it was a huge influence on my love for mythology and history. I
don't recall being shocked or titillated, even at 12.
TWELFTH NIGHT by William Shakespeare
Removed from the curriculum in Merrimack, NH in 1996, because it
violates the school board's decision not to teach about "alternative
lifestyles." I'm still trying to figure this one out. Surely they aren't
referring to Viola "cross-dressing" as a man?
LITTLE RED RIDING HOOD illustrated and retold by Trina Schart Hyman
(based on Brothers Grimm)
In 1989 the Empire and Culver City, California school districts banned
this Caldecott Honor version of the fairy tale because the cover shows a
bottle of what might be wine in Red's basket for her grandmother.
Authorities said the story "condones the use of alcohol." [My daughter
(and I) love Hyman's versions of classic fairly tales and she received
this one, and several others, as gifts as a child.]
MY FRIEND FLICKA by Mary O'Hara
In 1990 the book (first published in 1941) was excised from 5th- and
6th-grade optional reading lists in Clay County, Florida schools. The
book uses the word "bitch" to accurately refer to a female dog and the
word "damn." (We have a copy of this that belonged to my
now-middle-aged sisters-in-law. I was never much of a horse-book
reader.)
SOPHIE'S WORLD by Jostein Gaarder
I wish my children would read this book, but only extremely intellectual
young adults seem interested in it. Subtitled "A Novel about the History
of Philosophy" the book is a guide to western philosophical thought
presented as a novel. Evidently "Various viewpoints on
philosophy...could be found objectionable" and a paragraph or two (out
of 523 pages) with a liberal attitude (in keeping with the author's
Norwegian cultural views) for 15-18 year olds. (I left my copy of
SOPHIE'S WORLD lying out for months in hopes that a young adult would
pick it up. No go. Maybe if I tell them it was banned...)
* * *
ALA's List of the Ten Most Frequently Challenged Books in 2002
-
- Harry Potter series, by J.K. Rowling, for its focus on wizardry and
magic.
- Alice series, by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor, for being sexually
explicit, using offensive language and being unsuited to age group.
- The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier (the "Most Challenged" book of
1998), for using offensive language and being unsuited to age group.
- I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou, for sexual
content, racism, offensive language, violence and being unsuited to
age group.
- Taming the Star Runner by S.E. Hinton, for offensive language.
- The Adventures of Captain Underpants by Dav Pilkey, for insensitivity
and being unsuited to age group, as well as encouraging
children to disobey authority.
- The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, for racism,
insensitivity and offensive language.
- Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson, for offensive language,
sexual content and Occult/Satanism.
- Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry by Mildred D. Taylor, for
insensitivity, racism and offensive language.
- Julie of the Wolves by Jean Craighead George, for sexual content,
offensive language, violence and being unsuited to age group.
* * *
SOME WEB SITES OF INTEREST:
- American Library Association
- American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression
-
Bonfire of Liberties: Censorship of the Humanities
- Censored:
Wielding the Red Pen
An exhibition from the University of Virginia Libraries.
- The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund
The CBLDF 's guiding principle is that comics should be accorded the
same constitutional rights as any other form of expression. The Web site
offers extensive resources. For those wanting only a brief overview try:
A Brief
History of Comic Book Censorship
- Comic Books and Juvenile Delinquency: Interim Report of the Committee on
the judiciary (US Congress, Senate,1955-6)
This online version is strewn with typos, but is still worth reading for
statements like: "It has been pointed out that the so-called crime and horror comic books
of concern to the subcommittee offer short courses in murder, mayhem,
robbery, rape, cannibalism, carnage, necrophilia, sex, sadism,
masochism, and virtually every other form of crime, degeneracy,
bestiality, and horror. These depraved acts are presented and explained
in illustrated detail in an array of comic books being bought and read
daily by thousands of children. These books evidence a common penchant
for violent death in every form imaginable. Many of the books dwell in
detail on various forms on insanity and stress sadistic degeneracy.
Others are devoted to cannibalism with monsters in human form feasting
on human bodies, usually the bodies of scantily clad women."
- The File Room
An interactive and comprehensive look at censorship throughout history
- "He who destroyes a good Booke, kills reason it selfe" -- An exhibition
of books which have survived Fire, the Sword and the Censors
"During the McCarthy reign of terror, early in [Director of Libraries
Robert] Vosper's tenure-1951 to 1960-as Director of Libraries at KU, he
and the equally committed Chancellor, Franklin D. Murphy, supported what
became an internationally noted exhibition on intellectual freedom."
This is an online version. (The title comes from John Milton's "Areopagitica, A Speech for the
Liberty of Unlicence'd Printing, to the Parliament of England" (1644)
which was banned by Cromwell and the Parliament of Protestant England
for such sentences as: "And yet on the other hand unless wariness be
us'd, as good almost kill a Man as kill a good Booke; who kills a Man
kills a reasonable creature, Gods Image, but hee who destroyes a good
Booke, kills Reason itself, kills the Image of God as it were in the
eye.")
- The Online Books Page
Presents Banned Books Online
A special listing of books that have been the objects of censorship or
censorship attempts selected from the indexes of The Online Books Page.
- Other Days,
Other Ways: American Book Censorship, 1918-1945
An article by James J. Martin that originally appeared as the Afterword
[pp. 66-75] to An American Adventure in Bookburning in The Style of 1918
(Noontide Press).
Copyright (c) 2004 Writers on the Net.
This feature was originally published in "Writers.com," the monthly
electronic newsletter of Writers on the Net. This publication may not
be
reproduced in print or posted elsewhere on the Web or used in any other
fashion,
in whole or in part, without written permission from
Writers on the
Net/Writers.com. Subscribe here
or by emailing
writers@writers.com.
home:about:classes:enroll:services:instructors:newsletter:tips:store
writers on the
net/writers.com
© 1995-2005